skip to main content

I want to...

Current filter:

Facilities

The background to the new aquatic facility

The journey to a new aquatic facility started back in 2014 in response to community demand.

Floor Plan 00000003

Where are we up to?

Read the latest update on the status of this project here.

The concept design and engineering has been completed. The floor plan pictured above is a part of this. The design and fit out will be fiscally responsible but will still be an attractive and future-proof facility which Napier residents can be proud of and enjoy for many decades to come. We have saved millions of dollars and months of time through adapting an existing architectural plan to suit our community’s needs.

We have begun site improvement earthworks on the corner of Tamatea and Prebensen Drive, in preparation for the proposed new aquatic facility. A separate consent has been granted to carry out preloading works, which has no bearing on the construction resource consent process. The construction of the facility is still subject to a court hearing which took place from 30th September at Wellington High Court. The outcome of this case is some months away.

In the meantime, NCC is pleased to have come to an interim relief position through the Court, which will enable some scheduled work on the new aquatic facility to continue as planned. This means that work can continue with the resource consent process, preloading earthworks, the evaluation of tenders received and acceptance of the preferred tenderer by Council. The tender process closed earlier in July. Any final award of the contract will await the final outcome from the 30th September High Court hearing. 

The opportunity to preload before resource consent has been granted came about by NCC acquiring access to suitable fill that is below market rate. By using this fill now, NCC will save several months of project time, resulting in significant cost savings. Preparation of the site requires ‘preloading’ work, which means placing fill on top of the ground at the new building site. The purpose is to allow the fill and existing ground to settle and compact to a satisfactory level. This will be a period of at least three months. The site requires preloading no matter what is ultimately built there.

 The cost

The project has a capital cost of $41.3 million as outlined in the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan. This will be funded through $34 million in loans and $7.3 million from reserves. Total operating expenditure per year will be $3.3 million (including depreciation and interest on borrowings), and funded through rates and user charges.

 

No. 

The main lap pool is larger than the Ivan Wilson Pool and Old Pool combined.

The new design also includes:

  • a dedicated learn to swim pool that is larger than all current learn to swim pools combined, and is larger than the Ivan Wilson pool.
  • a dedicated leisure pool, open for use at all times, and also a 10m x 10m 'wet' playground.
  • an 8m x 20m warm water pool.
  • a 32-person spa pool

Providing too much pool space that will be unused most of time adds significant cost to both the build and operating costs, increasing the burden on ratepayers.

Furthermore:

  • A 50m pool can only be set to one temperature – while different user groups require different temperatures.  For example, teaching smaller kids to learn to swim at 28 degrees is too cold for them, similarly with rehabilitation and hydrotherapy for our growing population of over 65 years.
  • If there is a 'Code Brown' in a 50-metre pool, it would mean that the whole pool would shut down for 3-4 hours while the water is sanitised.  With separate pools, only one is out of action for this time.  
  • A 50-m  pool is more expensive to heat the water. Our business case financial projections estimated that the 50m pool option would cost ratepayers $200,000 more per year to operate – which is close to a 0.5% rates increase.
  • 50m pools are a nice to have, but not a need to have for competitive swimmers.  We have around 250 club swimmers in Napier, compared to a huge part of our population (e.g. over 65s, families that want to have fun, kids learning to swim) that are much better served with the different pools that meet each need more effectively.
  • Sport NZ – who play a leading role with facility development all across NZ have officially said that New Zealand does not need any more 50m pools.

 

After the Napier Aquatic Strategy was adopted back in 2015, two independent consultants, both based in Wellington, were brought in to assess the development of a facility at the Onekawa site. They were The Building Intelligence Group (TBIG), who are Construction Project Management specialists, and Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB), a multi-national corporation specialising in cost management, quantity surveying, project management and advisory services. Their feasibility studies highlighted significant risks with the Onekawa location, which drove Council to explore options for alternative sites.

The main issues that were identified with the Onekawa site was the risk of contaminants in an old landfill underground, which are currently covered and sealed by a layer of clean soil. These contaminants are safe while left undisturbed. The groundworks will require digging to a far greater depth than a standard residential build, and could create a health risk by exposing airborne contaminants, as well as the risk of a cost blow-out due to unknown factors.

The decision to change from a 50m pool to a 25m pool was made when a new 50m pool was confirmed for the Regional Sports Park in Hastings. It was decided that the region doesn’t need two pools of that length within close proximity.  Sport New Zealand also supported this decision and endorsed the development of the aquatic facility on the corner of Tamatea Dr and Prebensen Dr. The new site is capable of extending to a 50m pool in the future, if there is the demand for it. 

Moving to this new site means the wider community and current regular users of the Onekawa pool will not be without a pool during the 18-20 month construction period. Being without a pool for that length of time would seriously impact many groups that use the pool, such as learn to swim classes, swimming programmes and clubs as well as those who use it for general leisure and play. The Napier Aquahawks Committee support Council’s plan and look forward to working with NCC as the project progresses.

After the pool has moved, the Onekawa site will be turned into a new recreational space for the community to enjoy. The community will have opportunity to share their views on what they would like to see.

If the earthquake strengthening work hadn’t been carried out on the Ivan Wilson building housing the main indoor pool, spa pools, hydroslides and learners’ pool, we would have had to close two years ago.

 

The current site has pools, netball/tennis courts and Omnigym, but there are other organisations (eg. Plunket and Onekawa Kindergarten) there, which are not recreation-related. There isn’t much room to expand. The new site is 7ha, providing much greater potential to create a recreation hub in the future if required. It is also close to Park Island.

 

There are other schools which will be closer. Moving a facility will always have those that benefit, and those that don’t.

 

No. Access will be from Tamatea Drive, more than 200m from the Prebensen Drive intersection.  We are consulting on changing Tamatea Drive from a 70 km/h zone to a 50 km/h zone. Currently 92% of users drive to the facility. There is an iWay pathway near the site now, and foot and cycle traffic will be considered as part of the project.

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council are in charge of bus routes in Napier. Discussion is underway with the Regional Council to provide a bus stop to the facility  once it is opened - off-street, right outside the entrance. The nearest bus stop to the existing Napier Aquatic Centre is 500 metres away.

 

The proposed site is 3.2km away from the current site. There’s little difference in the size of the population living within a 3km radius of both areas, and there is large population growth closer to the new site. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council are in charge of bus routes in Napier. Discussion is underway with the Regional Council to provide a bus stop to the facility  once it is opened - off-street, right outside the entrance. The nearest bus stop to the existing Napier Aquatic Centre is 500 metres away.

When looking at all options of the new aquatic centre, decisions were based on the how the facility will benefit our communities’ health, wellbeing and cohesion, and can be a source of community pride. This is further broken down into six key areas.

  1. Aquatic visitors: Increase the number of people participating in aquatic sport and active recreation
  2. Community pride: Drive a major increase in community engagement satisfaction with aquatic facilities
  3. Water safety: Teach more Napier residents to be safe and confident in water
  4. Balance outcomes: Ensure we have the right balance of space and utilisation among our four outcome areas, which are sport development, leisure and play, water confidence and health and fitness
  5. Value for money: Deliver value for money for our ratepayers and our users
  6. Social cohesion: Improve social cohesion and inclusivity through ensuring all Napier residents benefit from the new facility.

There were three main areas of consideration that we looked at when deciding where to build the new aquatic centre, as outlined below:

  • Benefits: Allows for future expansion, continuity of service, impact on neighbours during construction, impact of change on residents and enhancing city pride
  • Risks: Contamination, long-term health risks and construction, and traffic
  • Financial: Capital and operational costs, plus the possible financial risk.

The Onekawa site is built on an old landfill, with the likelihood of buried hazardous materials such as asbestos, oil and lead. We won’t know the exact levels or quantities of these materials until the ground is literally peeled back and opened up. Not even test drilling will guarantee what is below the surface, as there could be contaminants either side of any drill hole. Any contaminated soil will require a special process to remove, with the potential of significant cost and time increases to the project. There is also the risk that contaminated gases and dangerous dust particles could leak into the air which is particularly of risk to the very young and old.  We have a kindergarten and Plunket centre on this site.

 

When the risks and costs (contamination, pool closure) associated with the Onekawa site were known, we looked at a number of alternative sites to understand if there was a better location. All alternative sites were considered based on the following criteria:

  • Was the site Council-owned?
  • Was it centrally located and accessible?
  • Was there sufficient space for the complex and parking?
  • How much work would be required to provide services to the site?
  • Would it be compatible with adjacent uses?
  • Was there space for future growth?
  • How visible was the site, and would it raise community pride?

The site has many positive attributes that was evident when feasibility work was undertaken:

  • It will cost $1.2 million less to develop and build the same facility, than at the current Onekawa site.
  • Increased financial risk associated with the costs of managing and removing contaminated soil from the Onekawa site.
  • Existing pathways provide good links to neighbourhoods.
  • Close proximity to Park Island sports hub – creating good synergies between recreational activities and the opportunity to further strengthen links with these groups.
  • Strategic and central location with good access for local residents and regionally (via the Expressway).
  • Total usable development space of approx. seven hectares that would allow for any type of future expansion – due to increased user demand, growing population, a change in community requirements or other facilities across the region.
  • Highly visible location.

The tables below show how the two locations stack up against the project vision and build requirements.

Onekawa

The project has a capital cost of $41.3 million as outlined in the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan. This will be funded through $34 million in loans and $7.3 million from reserves. Total operating expenditure per year will be $3.3 million (including depreciation and interest on borrowings), and funded through rates and user charges.

 

The new pool will increase the average rates amount by $67 per year, or $1.29 per week, as outlined in the Long Term Plan 2018-2028.

 

Loading...

Napier City Council - Copyright © 2019 Napier City Council

Disclaimers and Copyright
While every endeavour has been taken by the Napier City Council to ensure that the information on this website is accurate and up to date, Napier City Council shall not be liable for any loss suffered through the use, directly or indirectly, of information on this website. Information contained has been assembled in good faith. Some of the information available in this site is from the New Zealand Public domain and supplied by relevant government agencies. Napier City Council cannot accept any liability for its accuracy or content. Portions of the information and material on this site, including data, pages, documents, online graphics and images are protected by copyright, unless specifically notified to the contrary. Externally sourced information or material is copyright to the respective provider.

© Napier City Council - www.napier.govt.nz / +64 6 835 7579 / info@napier.govt.nz